The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument for the Exist

The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmo system of logical Argument for the Existence of God The cosmological crease seeks to plant the existence of God by looking at the universe. It is an A posteriori evidence based on experience and the observation of the world non logic so the outcome is probable or possible not definite. The argument is in trinity forms motion, causation and being. These atomic number 18 also the first three ways in the five ways presented by Aquinas through with(predicate) which he believed the existence of God could be shown. Aquinas regarded Aristotle as the oral sex philosopher so many of these concepts originate in the thinking of Aristotle. One spokesperson of the cosmological argument is the argument of causation. Everything has a cause. Everything itself has a cause. But, you cannot have an endless number of causes. Therefore thither mustiness have been an fortuitous causer, which causes everything to sink without itself being caused by anything else. Such an uncaused cause is what people clear by God. This idea was revisited by William Lane Craig who developed the Kalam cosmological argument. He reinforced the contention that the universe must have had a agent by firstly proving that the universe if finite. He proves this by explaining that the present would not exist in an real(a) infinite universe, because successive additions cannot be added to an actual infinite. The present does exist, as a result of a chronological serial of past events. The universe must be finite. Craig seeks to prove that the universe must have had a beginning in time and that there must have been a creator who was uncaused. The Kalam argument makes the cosmologi... ...but does not prove there was a being that started this. The beginning of the universe could be put discomfit to coincidence followed by the evolution of life. However, it does not disprove the existence of an uncaus ed causer. How do we not know that God was not responsible for the walloping bang? In conclusion we can see that there are many reasons to believe that the universe must have had a beginning. both(prenominal) from a philosophical and scientific point of view. However, this cannot be proved, we are dormant able to question the idea. It is also debatable as to whether or not a personal creator was involved. This is down to personal belief and combine in God. I do not personally believe that the cosmological argument is strong enough to prove the existence of God. But, it is very convince in proving that the universe had a beginning.